Resilience

From Water Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
A resilient system is able to adapt to change and still remain healthy, viable, and able to provide services that are critical to the organisms in the system; perhaps as importantly, a resilient system is able to shape change, not just to react. It avoids rigidity traps--resistance to outside ideas, to incremental changes, ignorance of feedback from the environment--and learns from the inevitable surprises in the adaptive cycle. Change is inevitable; rigid systems are more likely to collapse (lose their ability to provide social-ecological services) in the face of change. [1]
The Adaptive Cycle. See http://www.resalliance.org/593.php
The Adaptive Cycle. See http://www.resalliance.org/593.php


Many people today are trying to understand how the ecological idea of resilience can be used to evaluate and improve social-ecological systems (SES), systems in which humans make purposeful decisions that strongly interact with natural processes. Water management is a paradigmatic social-ecological system. Some interesting efforts to model and explain resilience as it applies to water management are:


See generally the online, open access Journal of Ecology and Society , the Resilience Alliance , the blog Resilience Science and the work of the Stockholm Resilience Center


Elinor Ostrom and others in the Resilience Alliance have worked hard to develop methods for studying an SES; in Ostrom's case, in particular,  methods for understanding the governance of common-pool resources (such as fresh water).
Multitier approach to SES study
Multitier approach to SES study


The authors of one of the major works of the Resilience Project list these as a summary of things to consider in times when past approaches to development are failing and possibilities for change are opened up.

  • Identify and reduce destructive constraints and inhibitions on change, such as perverse subsidies.
  • Protect and preserve the accumulated experience on which change will be based.
  • Stimulate innovation and communicate the results in a variety of safe-fail experiments that probe possible directions, in a way that are low in costs for people's careers and organizations' budgets.
  • Encourage new foundations for renewal that build and sustain the capacity of people, economies and nature for dealing with change.
  • Encourage new foundations to expand and communicate understanding of change.[2]


Water resource crises present just such times....





Notes

  1. C. S. Holling, L. H. Gunderson and G. D. Peterson, Sustainability and Panarchies, p. 63-102 in Gunderson and Holling (eds.), 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington: Island Press, see http://www.resalliance.org/593.php
  2. Berkes, Fikret(Editor). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Personal tools