Posts Tagged ‘bowden’

News Roundup

Friday, October 30th, 2009

Even leaving aside the saga at the Board of Elections, there have been too many interesting news stories lately to ignore.

1. The News and Observe has this story about inmates seeking release in connection with the Bowden case. (You can read previous posts about Bowden here and here.)

2. The paper’s also running a story about the sex-offenders-in-church controversy, in connection with a case in Chatham County. Check it out here.

3. UCLA Public Policy professor Mark Kleiman has just released a book called When Brute Force Fails, the gist of which seems to be that smarter policing strategies and alternatives to incarceration can reduce crime and the costs of crime control. You can read some blog posts he wrote based on the book at the Volokh Conspiracy; a good place to start is here. But the news I want to highlight isn’t acually about the book, which my colleague Jamie Markham may review later. Instead, it’s about one of the examples Kleiman uses — a pretty interesting effort to close down open-air drug markets in High Point. Apparently, community leaders, police, and state and federal proecutors worked together to identify and build cases against several leading drug dealers — but, instead of arresting them, the authorties brought them in for a come-to-Jesus meeting at which the drug dealers were give a choice: knock it off, or go to prison. According to this news story, the strategy worked to shut down the drug markets and improve the neighborhood. Pretty interesting, but I wonder whether the results of the “High Point low-arrest drug crackdown” have stood the test of time. Any High Point folks care to comment?

4. This British news story says that a California man, already serving a long sentence for one murder, is actively seeking to be sentenced to death in connection with a second murder, because he believes that the conditions of confinement on Death Row will be better than the conditions in general population. (Hat tip: Crime and Consequences.)

5. The Washington Post has jumped into the debate about whether federal law should provide for equal punishment for crack offenses and powder cocaine crimes. This contrarian editorial argues that it should not, though the wind seems to be blowing the other way these days.

6. I’m traveling today, which means I read the USA Today in the hotel lobby this morning. It had a fascinating story about a prisoner rodeo at the (in?)famous Angola prison in Louisiana.

News Roundup

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

The criminal-law-related legal news has been coming fast and furious over the past week or so.

1. The fallout from the Bowden case continues. The case, discussed here, held that a life sentence imposed during a several-year window in the 1970s meant 80 years, subject to further reduction through good time credits. Later this month, it will result in the release of a number of inmates, unless the federal authorities bring charges against them, which this News and Observer story says they may. (Statute of limitations and speedy trial issues appear to be significant barriers to such prosecutions. Unlike state law, federal law provides a statute of limitations for most felony offenses.) If they are released, it appears that virtually all of the inmates will be unsupervised by any probation or parole officer.

2. The federal Department of Justice just announced that it will discourage federal prosecutions of marijuana suppliers and users who are acting in conformity with state medical marijuana laws. Press release here, news story here. Obviously, there’s no direct impact on North Carolina, since state law doesn’t allow the use of marijuana for medical purposes, but perhaps it incrementally strengthens the hand of those who support the legalization of medical marijuana, by removing the objection that “allowing” medical marijuana is pointless in light of federal law prohibiting the possession and sale of marijuana under all circumstances.

3. With the Supreme Court underway on its new Term, the USA Today prepared this interesting story on Justice John Paul Stevens. The story characterizes him as a master tactician, assembling majorities for liberal viewpoints on an increasingly conservative Court, and suggests that his likely retirement — he hasn’t hired the usual spate of law clerks for next year — will leave the liberal wing of the Court without a clear leader.

4. The Washington Post wonders why President Obama has been slow to nominate candidates for federal judgeships.

5. There’s a new batch of Court of Appeals opinions today. As usual, we’ll unpack the most interesting ones on the blog in the next few days.