Posts Tagged ‘Distance Learning’

Webinars at the SOG: The Numbers

webinarWebinars are a major new way we’ve been frugal while providing real value to our clients where and when they need it.  SOG’s use of the webinars as a means of reaching out to clients has increased in recent months.

Here are some unofficial numbers as of October 1, 2009:

  • 24 webinars conducted
  • 5 webinars still scheduled for this fall
  • At least 2,599* webinar attendees
  • At least 1,105** webinar archive viewings

These figures include the EFC’s webinar use.  These days EFC runs about one webinar a month.  You can view their webinar schedule here.

Our webinars have overwhelmingly gone off well, but things don’t always go smoothly.  Being (mentally and logistically) prepared for technical problems (lost connections, frozen slides, audio difficulties) is important, and TLS can offer tips to help ensure a smoother recovery.  We are fortunate in that clients are very forgiving and consistently rate our webinars very highly

You can view some examples below.  Recognize the faces or voices?  Want to know more?  Contact Joel Galbraith AND go talk to your pioneering, trail-blazing, webinaring colleagues about their experience.

Notes:

*The real count is actually much higher, but numbers are difficult to pin down from server data alone since multiple registered clients often attend together around a single computer…but log in as a single user.

**Statistics for webinar archive views are also challenging to interpret, but we clearly distinguish an *additional* 1,105 archive viewings (688 in the Karl Smith Economy Webinar alone)

These numbers do *NOT* include Online Learning Modules (i.e. Indigent Defense Lectures, LME board training, Involuntary Commitment, Judicial College modules)

, ,

No Comments


Understanding SOG Webinars

sog_webinarsWe’ve written a couple posts now on webinars at SOG (here and here), but today’s event wins the prize.  For those unable to attend today’s webinar, you missed out!  I hope you will take the time to watch the archive.  It is well-worth a lunch time viewing…but not as good as the live event!

The goals of the webinar were to:

  1. give all attendees a first-hand look at what SOG webinars look–and act–like
  2. demonstrate a range of activities available in an SOG webinar (hint: you can do more than PowerPoint)
  3. Help you see ways a webinar might be useful to your courses, conferences and programs.

While viewing the archive, you’ll hear from numerous SOG colleagues: Donna Warner, Jen Lobenhofer, Joel Galbraith, Nancy Kiplinger, Shadi Eskaf, Cindy Lee.  You’ll also hear and read responses to a number of questions from your peers.

The webinar covers: using PowerPoints, playing videos, using multiple presenters, using remote presenters, conducting audience polls (ala TurningPoint and clickers), online group discussions, question moderating, shared web browsing, annotation, session breaks,  and much more  ;-)

Webinar archive link: http://breeze.unc.edu/p25529382/

Thank you to all those that helped with *and* participated in the event.  What did YOU think of it?  Did you gain any new insights?  What challenges/benefits do you foresee?  Please share your comments with us below!

-TLS team

,

No Comments


Micro-lectures: A Cure for Content Bloat

These Lectures Are Gone in 60 Seconds

You’ve heard of mini-lectures. Now come micro-lectures. This article from The Chronicle of Higher Education espouses a daring idea: Cut a 60-minute lecture down to a 60-second chunk for online audiences. Think it can’t be done? Click here to read how some instructors are doing it. Go ahead, we dare you…

Here are some additional examples of what other people and organizations are doing to get messages across in a short amount of time:

Petcha Kutcha (pronounced pet-chach-ka; Japanese for “chatter”). The only rule:  20 slides, 20 seconds each = 6:40 minutes.  It forces one to be concise.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGaCLWaZLI4&feature=player_embedded  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NZOt6BkhUg&feature=related

http://meetingsnet.com/checklistshowto/more/meetings_minilectures_learning/index.html 

A 90-second micro lecture example: http://chronicle.com/media/video/v55/i26/microlecture/

An example of a narrated Powerpoint presentation (3.5 mins): http://www.slideshare.net/ethos3/storytelling-101

A website devoted to short how-to videos. (cluttered, and you have to wait through a movie trailer, but it illustrates that you can convey good, *focused* material in 2 minutes. http://www.5min.com/Video/How-to-Plant-Small-Seeds-99747505

UNC-CH’s YouTube home. ( This one shows videos grouped under categories by groups or topics. We might consider having our own site.)  Click on the “playlist” link to see the videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/UNCChapelHill

UNC-CH School of Medicine site.  Click on the “Patient Stories” playlist.  (We could do something like this based on local government lessons from the field, etc.)http://www.youtube.com/user/uncmedicine

, , , , ,

No Comments


A (budget) Crisis is a Terrible Thing to Waste…

dl_5thingsTwo recent and related blog posts got me thinking this week.  From one I got the line “a crisis is a terrible thing to waste” (Lev Gonick).  From the other, “crisis + wit = opportunity”(Jon Mott).  Both capture the notion that there is an opportunity that would be a shame to waste in the current economic downturn.  In the case of the SOG, there is an opportunity to demonstrate the effectiveness of distance and online learning environments.  In many cases, both learners and faculty need convincing.  As Mott puts it:

Now that we face growing demand for our services (teaching and learning) at the exact moment that we’re facing resource constraints, we have a golden opportunity to demonstrate the value of our craft.

The “craft” Mott refers to is that of Instructional Design and the enterprise of distance teaching and learning.  Over 10 years ago, the Sloan-C Consortium published their 5 Pillars of Quality Online Education that listed areas in which an online learning program should excel to be considered successful.  I’ve taken a stab at contextualizing these for the SOG: Read the rest of this entry »

, ,

No Comments


Faculty Spotlight

DSS Attorney’s Conference Webinar

  • osullivan_jessica_2008_8766MASON, JANET 11/05/01Faculty: Janet Mason
  • Program Manager: Jessica O’ Sullivan
  • Event: 2009 Winter Conference for Social Services Attorneys
  • Type: Webinar (Adobe Connect Pro)
  • Date: February, 26, 27 (1.5 days)
  • Clients: 24 online; 75? local
  • Link (view sample): Day 1–Morning Session

Objective:

Make DSS attorney conference available in a satisfactory format to remote clients unable to travel to Chapel Hill .

Challenges:

  • Simultaneously present to local (SOG) and remote audiences.
  • Give remote participants equal ability to interact with local audience (ask questions and share comments).
  • Allow remote participants to hear local audience comments and questions.

Description:

click to view sample

click to view sample

Janet Mason received inquiries from several clients requesting a means to attend the 2009 Winter Conference for Social Services Attorneys remotely. Travel budget restrictions would have otherwise not allowed them to attend. Janet and Jessica contacted TLS mid-December 2008 (i.e. not last minute) to start discussing what options would be available for the February event. Videoconferencing and simple video recordings were eventually ruled out for various reasons, and it was decided to attempt a live simultaneous event with the face-to-face (f2f) conference. The online event received a unique course code, and course marketing, pricing and registration was identical to the f2f event.

Expectations for live interaction were set sufficiently low for online participants in the event interaction from remote audience would not be supported. The IT division was able to devise and test a solution which would both share conference presentations, and permit remote audience participation… Read the rest of this entry »

, ,

2 Comments


Distance Learning Preferences Poll: To listen or Read?

There’s often a difference between what we prefer, and what we really do.  This issue is seen in distance learning preference as well.  Most people generally prefer face-to-face instruction, but we’re all capable of learning in different ways, and do so on a regular basis (informally) while listening to the radio, reading an article etc.  We wouldn’t want all our learning to be classroom delivered.

In the distance learning world, instruction and knowledge is technologically mediated (delivered), and can generally take the form of temporal or time-based media (audio, video, presentations, lectures), or non-temporal media (text, images, slides only).  When we’re in a hurry, or are only marginally interested, we often prefer text which is easily skimmed.  There are times when we want to hear a good lecture, or casually listen while doing other things…and selectively pay attention when we get to the good (interesting) parts. Each has its merits.  One is not “better” for learning than the other…at least not on those grounds)

But I’m curious, Which do you prefer? To read or to listen?, and perhaps more importantly, if your online SOG training were to be presented in this way, which do you think you’re more likely to sit down and actually “do”?! Take the Poll (omit your name if you wish)

, , , , ,

No Comments


Distance Learning options at the SOG

Here are my slides on distance learning options at the SOG. Press the [cc] button on the player controls to display the slide “notes” for additional info, and note the button for watching the presentation full screen.  Some example links may no longer work.

I hope this helps make the options a little more understandable.
-Joel G.

, , , ,

No Comments



SetPageWidth